Political grandstanding or interpretations of law?
A feud is reportedly playing out among judges on the federal appeals court that upheld a block on President Trump's original travel ban. Politico reported Saturday that five judges on the San Francisco-based Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals this week publicly recorded their disagreement with last month's ruling made by t...
.
The view from here:They are supposed to be impartial interpreters of the law not partisan political enforcers.
.
They should lose their spot on the seat - and the blatancy of their intent is so obvious.
.
It is also obvious that "the Hill" has a bias as "the conservative" justices are simply in compliance with the law as written while "the liberal" judges are activists or adhering to an ideology rather than interpreting the law.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Share your thoughts!