Harvey Weinstein Is One of the Richest Men in Hollywood. Here's What We Know About His Money
For decades, movie mogul Harvey Weinstein was one of the richest and most powerful men in Hollywood—a VIP status that helped insulate him from sexual harassment allegations, according to some of his recent accusers.
While it's kinda' funny seeing Hillary try to explain away her, her husband, and Obama chillaxing with this dude like they are from the same ilk the longer this story gets played on multiple channels the more like a setup and the more choreographed it appears to be.
Is this an extension of anti-hetero/male politics?
Seems more and more that he took "No" as no and never retaliated.
Also appears most of these women signed themselves up for this scenario by manipulating themselves into the mindset of quid-pro-quo when none was stated by Weinstein.
So when these females decades later regret trying to use their bodies as a means to be promoted they group together and pile on as though he abused or raped them while others, in the same "victim" pool that morally refused and said no, we all look past the obvious emptiness of these claims because he's a dude and they're women?
What a double standard! – And that's not even getting into the non-exploratory "who cares" fast passing of any males, adult or under 18, that claim to have been sexually assaulted by gay men or pedophiles in Hollywood.
Putting these two scenarios together, and the timeframe with which the most recent claims of both sexes were aired, it becomes blatantly obvious that most hold a mindset that men are never victims and women are always victims.
Is feminism truly equality based?
Where are they – or anyone else, other than Lohan, to defend him against this obvious double standard?
How many of these women intended to use their bodies as a means to forward their positions and would've attempted to seduce him had he not wanted them – and/or were the actual perpetrators of their sexual encounter?
While it's kinda' funny seeing Hillary try to explain away her, her husband, and Obama chillaxing with this dude like they are from the same ilk the longer this story gets played on multiple channels the more like a setup and the more choreographed it appears to be.
Is this an extension of anti-hetero/male politics?
Seems more and more that he took "No" as no and never retaliated.
Also appears most of these women signed themselves up for this scenario by manipulating themselves into the mindset of quid-pro-quo when none was stated by Weinstein.
So when these females decades later regret trying to use their bodies as a means to be promoted they group together and pile on as though he abused or raped them while others, in the same "victim" pool that morally refused and said no, we all look past the obvious emptiness of these claims because he's a dude and they're women?
What a double standard! – And that's not even getting into the non-exploratory "who cares" fast passing of any males, adult or under 18, that claim to have been sexually assaulted by gay men or pedophiles in Hollywood.
Putting these two scenarios together, and the timeframe with which the most recent claims of both sexes were aired, it becomes blatantly obvious that most hold a mindset that men are never victims and women are always victims.
Is feminism truly equality based?
Where are they – or anyone else, other than Lohan, to defend him against this obvious double standard?
How many of these women intended to use their bodies as a means to forward their positions and would've attempted to seduce him had he not wanted them – and/or were the actual perpetrators of their sexual encounter?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Share your thoughts!