Typo spells OUTRAGE!!!

Typo spells OUTRAGE!!! Promotional poster for the inauguration of President Trump When does a product of third party merchandising and promotion represent insight into the
uppermost and highest ranking executive of the primary corporation?

What in the hell does this poster have, at all, to do with the Department of Education issue aside from a biased author's attempt to make a coincidence regarding two separate events that occurred at two separate points in time created by two separate governing bodies comprised of two different groups of people from two different offices appear as though this is somehow a display of a consistent pattern?

Since when did reporters think two points in a string created a repeating pattern?

The only pattern I'm able to decipher from within the string of reports about Trump and/or his administration is trough the many many points of contentious reports attempting to persuade the reader to think negatively of the new POTUS through half truths, manipulations, twisting of facts, results, or stories through "spin", emotional editorials pushed as factual news coverage, completely manufactured events like the supposed removal of a bust (link), and more.

That's the pattern these guys should be working on not the creation of one that has yet and/or may never exist.

Partisan biased writers should not be writing "News Reports" but editorial bits in their stead.
Freedom of the press and freedom of speech are not two facets of one declaration but two distinct, separate,

MLK bust in Oval Office

Bust of MLK in the Oval Office reported as removed and different rights that in context can themselves explain the difference between editorials and news as alluded to in the points made above.

The Freedom of the Press: *Allows reporters, of the profession, to write fact based informative reports, without bias or emotion, in a manner consistent with observations of an event. This freedom is to prevent a filter by a governing body that may attempt to hide its actions or shield itself from public scrutiny due to its actions being reported.

The Freedom of Speech: *Allows citizens, a "person", to write and/or say commentary on how or what they feel, believe, and or perceive the world around them including emotions, opinions, and/or persuasion of acceptance or agreement with the points the speaker is broadcasting into the public arena such as in an editorial, protest, or lecture.
These two freedoms are not meant to allow "the press", those relaying observation of an event, as run by an artificial entity or corporation, a fictional "person", to say an "editorial" and pass it off as a "news report".

This needs to stop and the NDAA section allowing use of propaganda within the US and its application and use on US citizens that was allowed to lapse during Obama's second term needs to be resigned back into law again as an additional measure to prevent this.

Further, corporations or fictional "persons" should not be equivalent to natural "persons" in regard to free speech as they are a body of or group of people and it is artificial rather than natural as in it is a man made corporate fiction.

Even if a corporation remains a "person" legally it should not be granted rights given to, or consider itself as a part of, "we the people".

What are your thoughts on the subject?

Please leave a comment below :)