Imaginary Numbers Are Real [Part 1: Introduction]
.
.
The problem, for me, lies in the fact that this assumes every single 2D equation is extruded in a dip below or above the X axis rather than in vertical from the plane.Just because we can use a square root of a negative number doesn't mean turning a 2D equation into 3D is a correct rendering.
.
Right or Wrong? Agree or Disagree?Tell us what you think in the comments below...or check out what's new on my other sites & profiles
++Imaginary Numbers Are Real [Part 1: Introduction]
##Imaginary Numbers Are Real [Part 1: Introduction] - #livinMicro #FairlyAdept #soWrongItsWrite #Imaginary #Numbers #Are #Real #Part #Introduction >> Commentary @ www.FairlyAdept.com | www.livinMicro.com
found here: Google+ | Pinterest | Facebook | Twitter | Instagram | Blogger | Tumblr | livinMicro | FairlyAdept | YouTube##Imaginary Numbers Are Real [Part 1: Introduction] - #livinMicro #FairlyAdept #soWrongItsWrite #Imaginary #Numbers #Are #Real #Part #Introduction >> Commentary @ www.FairlyAdept.com | www.livinMicro.com
.
will get back to you after I have watched all 13 parts.
ReplyDeletethe numberphile channel is much more entertaining. They use real world examples and uses rather than animations projected into a false third plane by rationalizing how one can square root a negative number into an imaginary dimension beyond the natural world. Math has tainted Physics into believing equations equate to proper testing through the scientific method.
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/user/numberphile
Thanks
Delete